Prince of Pot

Prince of Pot

The law is supposed to be fair and reasonable – but sometimes it isn’t.

Mr & Mrs Tafari’s dagga-growing tenant has been occupying – and trashing – their R2m Simon's Town home, rent-free, for the past three years.

They have been forced to defend eleven separate court hearings before eight different judges, before they were able, finally, to evict their Rastafarian squatter.

Guess who, in the meantime has been required – by law – to pay the bond, rates, water and electricity?

Evicted Rasta lawyer, Gareth Prince,  blames prejudice against marijuana cult for his running battle with desperate landlords.

Like to see more ?

Subscribe to our on-line edition !

For a mere R305.00 per year you get the convenience of our online version including:
  • Twelve monthly issues of Noseweek delivered to your browser
  • A searchable archive
  • Access to every back issue since 1993 !
  • A downloadable PDF version

If it’s just the article you are after, you can purchase it by clicking here.

Tempted ?

For a taste of what awaits you, you are welcome to browse this free issue.

South African
Gareth Prince
Constitutional Court
Security Of Tenure
Right To Shelter
Just And Equitable
Western Cape High Court
Judge Siraj Desai
Share this article:

Reader's comments

Like to add your own comment ? Please click here to subscribe - OR -
Submitted by : Pete Swanepoel of MONTCLAIR on 2015-06-06 13:55:38
To those who might call for "legal reform" (meaning less rights to appeal): Don't throw people's right to appeal and to seek relief out just because of one loony unemployed lawyer. Most people in fact don't access their rights, so please don't call for diminished rights based on this crazy and unusual case. That's my plea.
The JSC (or whoever) SHOULD, however check all these cases - Were the judges who assisted this unusual character correct? Did he lie to the judge when he got a new case number? Check what actually happened, don't just dive for undoing necessary laws.
Submitted by : Philip Bam of Cape Town on 2015-06-02 07:39:22
Our constitution and the PIE Act protects both landlord and tenant but it appears as if the owner was seriously let down by our judicial system. The tenant is obviously not ignorant of the law of contracts and he should have paid his rent. If people are recklessly negligent, they should not cry foul.


While every reasonable effort is taken to ensure the accuracy and soundness of the contents of this publication, neither the authors nor the publishers of this website bear any responsibility for the consequences of any actions based on the information contained therein.

Important information regarding cookies
By using this website, you consent to the use of cookies in accordance with our Privacy Policy.